Labor Market Competition and Individual Preferences over Immigration Policy
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper uses three years of individual-level data to analyze the determinants of individual preferences over immigration policy in the United States. We have two main empirical results. First, less-skilled workers are signi cantly more likely to prefer limiting immigrant in ows into the United States. Our nding suggests that, over the time horizons that are relevant to individuals when evaluating immigration policy, individuals think that the U.S. economy absorbs immigrant in ows at least partly by changing wages. Second, we nd no evidence that the relationship between skills and immigration opinions is stronger in high-immigration communities.
منابع مشابه
Public Finance and Individual Preferences over Globalization Strategies
Do preferences toward globalization strategies vary across publicfinance regimes? In this paper, we use data on individual preferences toward immigration and trade policy to examine how pre-tax and posttax cleavages differ across globalization strategies and state fiscal jurisdictions. High exposure to immigrant fiscal pressures reduces support for freer immigration among U.S. natives, especial...
متن کاملWhat Determines Individual Preferences Over Trade and Immigration Policy?
This paper uses three years of individual-level data to analyze the determinants of individual preferences over trade and immigration policies in the United States. Different economic models make contrasting predictions about what forces should shape these preferences. We have four main empirical results. First, we find that factor type dominates industry of employment in explaining support for...
متن کاملDo Concerns About Labor Market Competition Shape Attitudes Toward Immigration? New Evidence
Are concerns about labor market competition a powerful source of anti-immigrant sentiment? Several prominent studies have examined survey data on voters and concluded that fears about the negative effects of immigration on wages and employment play a major role generating anti-immigrant attitudes. We examine new data from a targeted survey of U.S. employees in 12 different industries. In contra...
متن کاملReferendum-led Immigration Policy in the Welfare State
Majority voting outcomes over different immigration levels of lowskilled workers are examined in a two-period overlapping-generation model in which the labour market and intraand intergenerational transfer schemes translate the impact of immigration into preferences of heterogeneous citizens. In most of the cases being examined, the model predicts a unique policy choice. However, a voting cycle...
متن کاملEducated Preferences: Explaining Attitudes Toward Immigration in Europe
Recent studies of individual attitudes toward immigration emphasize concerns about labor market competition as a potent source of anti-immigrant sentiment, in particular among less-educated or lessskilled citizens who fear being forced to compete for jobs with low-skilled immigrants willing to work for much lower wages. We examine new data on attitudes toward immigration available from the 2003...
متن کامل